2 IDIOTS OUTLOOK ON LIFE NO RESPECT ALSO FOR VICTUMS OF 911
[01:46] Monday November 17, 2008 A STUPID EMAIL LIKE THIS HAS GOT TO BE POSTED I WANDER IF THESE OLD MEN GOT GIRL FRIENDS? OR EVEN A LIFE? FAT OLD DUDES SITTING BEHIND A COMPUTER ONE OF THEM IS A MISFIT;; THE OTHER WITH THE LONGER EMAIL A FLAMEING IDIOT SUPREME ROLF I DID LAUGHT HARD ON BOTH PATHETIC CHARACTORS ONE OWES ME 100.000 BUT WE ARE SUEING FOR THE MONEY FROM ACE BAKER MY LAWYER WANTS THESE EMAILS I LIKE TO ALSO SHARE THIS RATHER INTERESTING PATHOLOGY OF THE MIND OF THESE CYBER FLAMERS LIKE I DID WITH SUPREME ONE AERIELLE LOUISE SERBAN
Home
INBOX
Compose
Search
Addresses
Settings
Logout
heffect@infinet.net
Back to messages Next
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:56:46 -0800
From: Mark S Bilk
To: the911coverup@yahoogroups.com
Cc: ace baker, akd@uwo.ca, americanoperdido@gmail.com, andrewkornkven@yahoo.com, aussiesoundengineer@gmail.com, bob@thepatriots.us, brucerideout@yahoo.com, bshonegg@nps.edu, captainmay@prodigy.net, Cb_Brooklyn , chossudovsky@videotron.ca, craigbhill@gmail.com, denzen@umich.edu, SHURE Dj , dogbonz@digitron.net, donpaul@wireonfire.net, Dick Eastman , econrn@suddenlink.net, esalter1@mindspring.com, fintan@breakfornews.com, frameup@yahoogroups.com, Russ Gerst <88tbirdtc@mchsi.com>, hardevidence@gmail.com, heffect@infinet.net, Gerard Holmgren , MARCUS ICKE , james.t.hoffman@gmail.com, jfetzer@d.umn.edu, jocklerouque@yahoo.com, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , nateflach@hotmail.com, nicohaupt2@yahoo.com, paula@rabbitholecentral.tv, rgage@ae911truth.org, Rasga Saias , simonshack@libero.it, stj911.info@yahoo.com, tarpley@tarpley.net, truthaction@hotmail.com, urban-badger@hotmail.co.uk, Judy Wood , Mark S Bilk
Subject: The "Hutchison Effect" Does Not Exist -was: Reprehensor Hit Piece on Judy Wood
Show headers:All | Normal
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Forward as attachment | Delete View email as: Raw | XML
The phenomena in all of the "Hutchison Effect" videos that I've
seen can easily be created by conventional means.
The ones with objects flying upwards can be created by hiding
pieces of iron inside the objects, placing them in a wooden box
that has the video camera attached rigidly to it and an
electromagnet (or several of them) attached under the bottom of
the box. The electromagnets are switched on, the camera is
started, and the box is rotated 180 degrees so that the objects
are now hanging upside down, held up by the electromagnets. But
since the camera rotated with the box the video does not show the
rotation. The electromagnets, which are holding the objects to
what is now the top of the box, but appears in the video as still
the bottom, are switched off. The objects fall down, but in the
fraudulently inverted video, they appear to rise up.
Videos that show little objects jumping up and down can be
made with the use of an ordinary high-voltage generator
(e.g. Van de Graaff). The objects come into contact with a
high-voltage electrode, receive a charge, are then repelled by
the electrode (since it has the same polarity charge) and jump
into the air, lose their charge, fall back onto the electrode,
and the cycle repeats. I think it can even be done by rubbing
an insulating rod with a piece of fur to charge the rod, and
using small bits of paper.
Objects can be made to rotate by creating a rotating magnetic
field around them, as is done in every induction motor on the
planet.
Metal bars with gnarly ends can be molded, in particular in molds
made from plants with short stubby roots.
Note also that Hutchison claims that his "Effect" results when
high-voltage DC and RF fields are simultaneously present in the
same space. But this occurs all the time in high-power vacuum
tube radio, TV, and radar transmitters, and RF generators for
particle accelerators. The dual fields are of extremely high
intensity inside the vacuum tubes themselves. This has been
going on for 80 years, but there have never been any reports
of antigravity or of objects losing their cohesion in these
environments. This proves that the "Hutchison Effect" cannot
possibly exist.
Finally, unless one is using as a computer terminal an ancient
teletype machine that lacks lower-case, it's not advisable to
type in all-caps. It comes across as screaming or insanity,
not emphasis.
Mark
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:19:51PM -0800, heffect@infinet.net wrote:
> NO NOT STRANGE AT ALL ; AS THE HUTCHISON EFFECT IS NOW ESTABLISHED FOR A LONG
>TIME
> ; TO UNSTABISH IT ONE WOULD
> HAVE FIGHT ENDLESS NEWS AGENTS AND SCIENTISTS AND PUBLICATIONS
> PLUS ALSO MY AGENTS MIGHT HAVE CONTACTED THESE FOLKS
> TO GET MY NAME OUT OF THIS AS TO THE CONSPIRACY TYPE STUFF CONNECTED WITH IT
>...
http://911blogger.com/node/18474
He completely misquotes my lyric, but that's beside the point. Clearly, Reprehensor's intent is to discredit Judy Wood and her DEW theory. And yet, there is not one word about John Hutchison, nor the the Hutchison Effect.
Isn't that strange?
There is no Hutchison Effect. What easier way to discredit Judy, than pointing out that Hutchison is a fake, as I have done. Why would Reprehensor ignore the obvious?
I know the answer, but let's see if some of you all can figure it out.
Sincerely,
Ace Baker
Copyright © 2002 Infinet Communications Group
Home
INBOX
Compose
Search
Addresses
Settings
Logout
heffect@infinet.net
Back to messages Next
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:56:46 -0800
From: Mark S Bilk
To: the911coverup@yahoogroups.com
Cc: ace baker
Subject: The "Hutchison Effect" Does Not Exist -was: Reprehensor Hit Piece on Judy Wood
Show headers:All | Normal
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Forward as attachment | Delete View email as: Raw | XML
The phenomena in all of the "Hutchison Effect" videos that I've
seen can easily be created by conventional means.
The ones with objects flying upwards can be created by hiding
pieces of iron inside the objects, placing them in a wooden box
that has the video camera attached rigidly to it and an
electromagnet (or several of them) attached under the bottom of
the box. The electromagnets are switched on, the camera is
started, and the box is rotated 180 degrees so that the objects
are now hanging upside down, held up by the electromagnets. But
since the camera rotated with the box the video does not show the
rotation. The electromagnets, which are holding the objects to
what is now the top of the box, but appears in the video as still
the bottom, are switched off. The objects fall down, but in the
fraudulently inverted video, they appear to rise up.
Videos that show little objects jumping up and down can be
made with the use of an ordinary high-voltage generator
(e.g. Van de Graaff). The objects come into contact with a
high-voltage electrode, receive a charge, are then repelled by
the electrode (since it has the same polarity charge) and jump
into the air, lose their charge, fall back onto the electrode,
and the cycle repeats. I think it can even be done by rubbing
an insulating rod with a piece of fur to charge the rod, and
using small bits of paper.
Objects can be made to rotate by creating a rotating magnetic
field around them, as is done in every induction motor on the
planet.
Metal bars with gnarly ends can be molded, in particular in molds
made from plants with short stubby roots.
Note also that Hutchison claims that his "Effect" results when
high-voltage DC and RF fields are simultaneously present in the
same space. But this occurs all the time in high-power vacuum
tube radio, TV, and radar transmitters, and RF generators for
particle accelerators. The dual fields are of extremely high
intensity inside the vacuum tubes themselves. This has been
going on for 80 years, but there have never been any reports
of antigravity or of objects losing their cohesion in these
environments. This proves that the "Hutchison Effect" cannot
possibly exist.
Finally, unless one is using as a computer terminal an ancient
teletype machine that lacks lower-case, it's not advisable to
type in all-caps. It comes across as screaming or insanity,
not emphasis.
Mark
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:19:51PM -0800, heffect@infinet.net wrote:
> NO NOT STRANGE AT ALL ; AS THE HUTCHISON EFFECT IS NOW ESTABLISHED FOR A LONG
>TIME
> ; TO UNSTABISH IT ONE WOULD
> HAVE FIGHT ENDLESS NEWS AGENTS AND SCIENTISTS AND PUBLICATIONS
> PLUS ALSO MY AGENTS MIGHT HAVE CONTACTED THESE FOLKS
> TO GET MY NAME OUT OF THIS AS TO THE CONSPIRACY TYPE STUFF CONNECTED WITH IT
>...
http://911blogger.com/node/18474
He completely misquotes my lyric, but that's beside the point. Clearly, Reprehensor's intent is to discredit Judy Wood and her DEW theory. And yet, there is not one word about John Hutchison, nor the the Hutchison Effect.
Isn't that strange?
There is no Hutchison Effect. What easier way to discredit Judy, than pointing out that Hutchison is a fake, as I have done. Why would Reprehensor ignore the obvious?
I know the answer, but let's see if some of you all can figure it out.
Sincerely,
Ace Baker
Copyright © 2002 Infinet Communications Group
Labels: ALL OUR YESTERDAYS, H, http://www.myspace.com/johnkhutchison, john kenneth hutchison
posted by Unknown at 1:46 AM
<< Home