Saturday, June 20, 2009

paris hilton 2008

b
Paris Hilton shows another side, insightful, philosophical, bright and determined. Here is a collection of posts and emails between her and John. An insiders look reveals more than one would be led to believe by the media.
John,” From Paris Hilton John ? Gordon does he want me in the film ? Let me backtrack into an idea lol ;; I’ve been successful at every last thing I’ve done since that time (except personal relationships, but I think I now understand why I do that to myself, too…another time for that discussoin, though, especially as I have left that behind me now). WHY have I been successful? Because every time I walked into an interview, or tried to do/accomplish something, I did it from that same mindset…and there was a principle at play here — act like you already are. Step into the role…and it becomes yours. Believe. Faith in the mystery. Simple analogy here. Someone doesn’t need to understand WHY flipping the switch makes the light go on…they just need to believe they should flip the switch, to take advantage of the technology. John, the believing…It has NEVER failed. I believe in this principle, completely, totally. I also believe that reality is, for lack of a better way to verbalize it, largely under our control. That we script our own lives to a very large degree. People get caught up in their dramas, and forget that at any moment, we can completely walk, totally flip the script. But it is ever there. It is a powerful thing to know, and I’ve done it, seen others do it. Many best-selling self-help books are based on it, too. Think and Grow Rich, for instance.
Anyhow…here goes. I want a partner —someone who is willing to toy with reality with me..someone to help me write a script, and see what happens. With complete intent. Far more so than what I played with over the years. Thing is, if you don’t believe in the script with every last atom of your being, it won’t work. It will automatically fail. What script? Anything we want, and I am pretty much open to trying ANY, as long as it doesn’t hurt, demean, or psychologically harm my kids, myself, or you if you find this idea intriguing enough to try. The script can be anything…we can work together, scripting a project as large or small as we like, and make it a reality. In an area totally expected, or so far out there it is unbelievable. It can be a unique friendship with magical qualities (believe the magic is there, and it will be). It can be an exploration of hard core scientific ‘facts’ that we seek to either support or undo, or it can be an exploration of the paranormal. Psychological explorations. ANYTHING, the only limits being our imagination. I know the examples I set herein aren’t revealing the deep power of this…and that perhaps I framed this in a way that is missing the passion that is possible in something like this..I am not talking of mundane things. I’m talking we write a script, agree it is going to be a reality, and make it happen. This is not like writing a business proposal (though I believe that that is WHY business proposals become reality…someone has set a path to making something concrete…I believe reality is about focus, and a business plan creates focus). I am talking about AGREEING TO A SCRIPT AND THEN CHANGING OUR PARADIGM IMMEDIATELY TO EMBRACE IT. Oh, I KNOW I’m not getting it right in here. I cannot put it into words tonight…why? Because it is so exciting to me that I can feel every atom of my being jumping about at the possibility. I’m talking it can be ANYTHING. Walk through walls? Why not? And if we can do things with machines…hmmm…maybe you will think this nuts, but I’ll try it on for size, learn a bit about you. I know I risk losing your respect here, perhaps. but so be it, truth and honesty come first. You can build a machine that can do unusual things…for instance, levitation. But see…ok, Bach put it best in illusions (I’m going to paraphrase, it has been forever since I read it). He wanted to fly –without a plane. Figures that planes took so long to be invented because noone believed they could be. Once someone believed, bam, it was made into reality. HOwever, the person(s) imagining flight were imagining it with machines. If you believe you can fly without a machine, it is merely a matter of experimenting until you find the right way…same thing they did when experimenting with machines that could fly. In other words, once you believe it is possible, you apply yourself to discovering the principles. For instance, you can make things levitate with the aid of a machine. Well, what if you shift the paradigm and believe you can make things levitate WITHOUT a machine. What if you modify the definition of machine to include YOUR BRAIN OR BODY CHEMISTRY as a machine…could you then begin to reframe it all, with looking to levitate with the aid of a new machine, your brain? Or with the electrical impulses in your body? From there you can start to examine your biology, in relation to the chemical makeup of the world around you. Are there ways in which they interact that can be manipulated, without a machine, but with some approach akin to biofeedback (ah, not exactly, but I am trying to NOT write an entire book to you tonight, lol…are you getting the idea? Is this totally insane? ).

Image Loading...


Paris Hilton was born February 17, 1981, to Rick and Kathy Hilton, making her the great-granddaughter of Conrad Hilton, founder of the Hilton hotels. Her grandfather, Conrad ''Nicky'' Hilton, Jr., was the first of Elizabeth Taylor's many ex-husbands. Paris' younger sister, Nicky (born in 1983), shares the throne as co-heiress of the Hilton empire.
Paris grew up in Manhattan's Waldorf-Astoria, the family's New York home, as well as other Hilton homes in Beverly Hills and the Hamptons.
Paris has two younger brothers, Barron Nicholas Hilton & Conrad Hughes Hilton.
In October 2004, Paris officially had her popular quote, "That's hot", trademarked.

Paris' new reality T.V. show with MTV is all set to kick off this fall.With the number of BFF participants topping 80 000, John Hutchison close friend, continues to support Paris' latest adventure. John and Paris expect to collaborate soon on a network television series geared for understanding quantum science. The people appearing below, are contestants to MTV'S Best Friends Forever show starring Paris Hilton. MTV built Paris quite a site, with a fab new concept. There are so many really bubbly personalities floating to the surface there. Videos for each applicant are on their profile, cast your vote for all your favorites, message the contestants, register and create your own profile and who knows, You could be the next big thing!...... But it's over now. May Paris find her Best friend Forever. The basic concept for the show is that a number of persons will spend time in the mansion with each other and Paris. As you might imagine, aliances will be created and dashed as everyone who loves Paris lines up for a a shot to become her new Best Friend Forever.



Paris Hilton shows another side, insightful, philosophical, bright and determined. Here is a collection of posts and emails between her and John. An insiders look reveals more than one would be led to believe by the media.
John,” From Paris Hilton John ? Gordon does he want me in the film ? Let me backtrack into an idea lol ;; I’ve been successful at every last thing I’ve done since that time (except personal relationships, but I think I now understand why I do that to myself, too…another time for that discussoin, though, especially as I have left that behind me now). WHY have I been successful? Because every time I walked into an interview, or tried to do/accomplish something, I did it from that same mindset…and there was a principle at play here — act like you already are. Step into the role…and it becomes yours. Believe. Faith in the mystery. Simple analogy here. Someone doesn’t need to understand WHY flipping the switch makes the light go on…they just need to believe they should flip the switch, to take advantage of the technology. John, the believing…It has NEVER failed. I believe in this principle, completely, totally. I also believe that reality is, for lack of a better way to verbalize it, largely under our control. That we script our own lives to a very large degree. People get caught up in their dramas, and forget that at any moment, we can completely walk, totally flip the script. But it is ever there. It is a powerful thing to know, and I’ve done it, seen others do it. Many best-selling self-help books are based on it, too. Think and Grow Rich, for instance.
Anyhow…here goes. I want a partner —someone who is willing to toy with reality with me..someone to help me write a script, and see what happens. With complete intent. Far more so than what I played with over the years. Thing is, if you don’t believe in the script with every last atom of your being, it won’t work. It will automatically fail. What script? Anything we want, and I am pretty much open to trying ANY, as long as it doesn’t hurt, demean, or psychologically harm my kids, myself, or you if you find this idea intriguing enough to try. The script can be anything…we can work together, scripting a project as large or small as we like, and make it a reality. In an area totally expected, or so far out there it is unbelievable. It can be a unique friendship with magical qualities (believe the magic is there, and it will be). It can be an exploration of hard core scientific ‘facts’ that we seek to either support or undo, or it can be an exploration of the paranormal. Psychological explorations. ANYTHING, the only limits being our imagination. I know the examples I set herein aren’t revealing the deep power of this…and that perhaps I framed this in a way that is missing the passion that is possible in something like this..I am not talking of mundane things. I’m talking we write a script, agree it is going to be a reality, and make it happen. This is not like writing a business proposal (though I believe that that is WHY business proposals become reality…someone has set a path to making something concrete…I believe reality is about focus, and a business plan creates focus). I am talking about AGREEING TO A SCRIPT AND THEN CHANGING OUR PARADIGM IMMEDIATELY TO EMBRACE IT. Oh, I KNOW I’m not getting it right in here. I cannot put it into words tonight…why? Because it is so exciting to me that I can feel every atom of my being jumping about at the possibility. I’m talking it can be ANYTHING. Walk through walls? Why not? And if we can do things with machines…hmmm…maybe you will think this nuts, but I’ll try it on for size, learn a bit about you. I know I risk losing your respect here, perhaps. but so be it, truth and honesty come first. You can build a machine that can do unusual things…for instance, levitation. But see…ok, Bach put it best in illusions (I’m going to paraphrase, it has been forever since I read it). He wanted to fly –without a plane. Figures that planes took so long to be invented because noone believed they could be. Once someone believed, bam, it was made into reality. HOwever, the person(s) imagining flight were imagining it with machines. If you believe you can fly without a machine, it is merely a matter of experimenting until you find the right way…same thing they did when experimenting with machines that could fly. In other words, once you believe it is possible, you apply yourself to discovering the principles. For instance, you can make things levitate with the aid of a machine. Well, what if you shift the paradigm and believe you can make things levitate WITHOUT a machine. What if you modify the definition of machine to include YOUR BRAIN OR BODY CHEMISTRY as a machine…could you then begin to reframe it all, with looking to levitate with the aid of a new machine, your brain? Or with the electrical impulses in your body? From there you can start to examine your biology, in relation to the chemical makeup of the world around you. Are there ways in which they interact that can be manipulated, without a machine, but with some approach akin to biofeedback (ah, not exactly, but I am trying to NOT write an entire book to you tonight, lol…are you getting the idea? Is this totally insane? ).
I have talked this over with the other PERSON on many occasions. At one point, when we were both already in a relationship, we were discussing WHY arranged marriages seem to turn out so well (the studies on this are astounding). Yes, there is something to the fact that perhaps the parents are choosing well, based on compatability factors, and matching up socio-economic levels, etc. BUT, what if it were not because of that, but because of the paradigm. You are entering into a relationship based upon the premise that it is going to work. You walk down that aisle, perhaps seeing your husband for the first time, and you go home, and you make it work. That is all. No questions asked. This is reality . You are married, and it is going to work. We used to toy with the idea (we were both pretty unhappy in the relationships we were in at the time, lol). What if we had found a like-minded soul, someone we could trust inherently, know competely, and sat down and wrote a script? There is a song by Jewel called Painters. She tells of a couple who made their love an art to live by…created blueprints for their love. This song sort of captures a bit of this concept…you agree to do something, and manifest it. SEE???? This principle can be applied to ANYTHING. (I’m going to attach the lyrics to the song below, it is such a cool thing,l think).
I believe the love story of authors Henry Miller and Anais Nin is one of the greatest in history (not the greatest, but definitely ONE of the greatest). I have a sneaking suspicion that they did something similar to this. Their’s was bittersweet, they didn’t wind up together in the end. But I think they WANTED it that way…for they were writers, and they appreciated the tragic beauty of such a story, the poignancy. And each had their own life, their own love, their own interests. They created Miller and Nin, greatest love story of their time..with intent. More for the poetry, than pehaps for what was there.
So see, it can be applied to anything. Let us build a flying machine never before seen, or a board game wherein the pawns electronically communicate with the board, and assess different situations, let us walk through a wall, or communicate with another dimension, or get to know an entity personally, as in very well, or open a museum just for kids unlike any that has ever before been seen, that blows away all science museums ever before seen…an imaginarium that pushes the limits; let us create a sci-fi story (fact or fiction, perhaps a combination of both) that pushes the limits; let us create our own frankenstein; let us convince authorities to let us camp out in the sphinx for a night…do you see what I’m saying? Let us begin a great game…let us break all rules, let us warp and distort reality, make our own stories, rescript life. lol, I guess I’m asking you to join me in an adventure, but not the kind people typically explore. When time allows after this jail MESS LOL OK??????
I THINK what I’m proposing is that we become ‘partners in crime’ (lol, though I’m not talking crime per se, because I want permissions where permissions aren’t granted — oh, and btw, my friends and I , back then, would create little challenges, like ‘breaking a minor law, right in front of a police officer, and getting him to laugh about it wiht you’ - or getting the police and fire department who show up to close down your party to instead come join it when they are off duty, Well I think this jail time lol “”"”"Was not fun “”"Or to get the 80 y/o senator to come to the nightclub and dance on the speakers with you; to get John Updike to play telephone at the dinner table with you…we did all these things - oh, and to go out for an evening, and pretend you are named ginger and maryann, and go the whole night telling people your life story as if you really WERE stranded on an island, and to do it so in such a way that they believed you, and never caught on that you were taking it straight from the script of gilligan’s island). But I want to take it to new levels…with no limits.
ANYTHING JOHN!!! And what I’m asking here is a simple experiment. Let us get creative, let our imaginations run wild, and try it out…something intriguing, unusual, out there. Just between us…no one else has to know. We can start oh-so-small. We don’t even have to meet to do it, even. I’m saying, let us be reality weavers, cloudbusters, whatever..but with intent, and with the complete commitment to the idea that we are not limited WHATSOEVER by laws of physics/nature/culture…
I’m not saying be totally mad in this…or dangerous even. (oh, but the idea itself seems so dangerous…do you know what I mean when I say ideas can be dangerous? Not to others so much as ourselves…an idea can shake us to the core of our being…can change our entire world, leave us unsettled to the end of our days…!). I’m just saying…let us script something crazy, and make it reality.
Sort of like Dungeons and Dragons, but different, lol. And real. If you think about it, where really IS the difference between fantasy and reality? You may be sitting there on your sofa, someone who has never traveled more than 50 miles from their home. You see a show that gets you thinking…I want to see Paris! Something inside you shifts, you believe now that you will see Paris. Next thing you know, you are saving money. Looking into fares. Taking time off from work. Booking your flight. Departing on that flight.
What if you were sitting on your sofa, and instead of deciding you want to go to Japan lets say you decide you want to walk through walls? And something shifts inside you, you now believe that you WILL walk through walls. Well…the only thing that TRULY makes this more difficult to do than Japan is that no one has left you a blueprint…see, you know, be it from friends, or TV, or reading, or from experience, what planning a trip will involve. Well, planning to walk through walls, we don’t have good information on how to do that, and we haven’t seen it being done for real. We’ve seen others decide to go to Japan and make it happen, so it is TANGIBLE to us. WEll…those who first built flying machines were in the same position as the fella sitting on the couch deciding to walk through walls… no prior examples of success, no blueprints.
YOU of all people should get this. You have been an explorer, a discoverer, a detective. What I’m proposing here is we pick ANYTHING. only imagination limits us. And we do it. More intentionally. And we document it. ANd if it is intriguing, we spoon feed the concept to the rest of the world. Give others a little magic to believe in. Open a few minds. Let others see that life is endless possibility. Because…it is. But people get trapped, and it is all illusion, it is only their own minds, their own imaginations that hold them back.
OK, I can’t fully explain what I’m proposing here. I’m just saying…take this little bit that I put forth here, and let us play…like children…like god-children, children who have the ability to weave worlds…because isn’t that all ANY of us do when we write the script that is our life? Because let us be honest here, we DO write our scripts. OK, one can argue that the juvenile factors aren’t written by us…even if we don’t touch that one…who we are today is determined by us, by each choice we make along the way…oh, I hope I haven’t lost you here. I’m sleepy, and not getting this down as lucidly, as eloquently as I’d like.
I approach you with this (and Laura and I have always been, till now, too afraid to share the idea with anyone else, because we didn’t think anyone else would get it…) because you are the explorer that you are, you have a solid education in both science and the paranormal, a tremendous imagination, and I have connected with you on a deep level that I think indicates (I could be wrong…in everything…in all things…that is my caveat) you have wha t it takes, and that we have enough in common on the levels where it is important, to make this happen.
SO…do you want to try this little game? Write the script with me…whatever it may be. You can throw the subjects out there, I’m open to exploring pretty much any idea…again, if I am not comfortable with something, I will simply tell you it.
Think on this. The possibilities are endless. I guess what I”m saying is this: Let’s explore the potential to STOP EVERYTHING and take as full a control of our destiny (in one small area at least) as we can. The examined life. The chosen life. The life uncommon.
Doing this with a partner is, as Laura and I discussed, what will make it more real….someone to collaborate with.
And yes, she and I did play with this a little bit. And on minor levels we have made it happen. Thing is, she and I have very different lives right now, as she has toddlers to raise, an out-of-work husband, and a huge law career that she is tryingt o juggle. Time to commit to changing any of that is what she lacks (ironic, as those are EXACTLY the kinds of things she could address..I think she is just afraid). SO…I’m proposing a leap in reality.
LOL…and while I nkow what I mean by this, I also DO NOT know what I mean…meaning (lol) that I know it intuitively, but it is yet needing more focus…
Am I making ANY sense at all? I’m talking, quite simply, taking the bull by the horns…but in something wherein most people don’t…any topic. any area of life. think about it…
Or write me off as too much of a fruitcake to deal with…I wouldn’t blame you, to be honest.
Anyhow, song lyrics are below….Hugs! Paris oops getting very ready to be released from here JAIL lol More medias Just like my first post remember ?thank you for saving them “John “PARIS HILTON” PXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 818XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX310XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 310XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX






©2008-2009 Adrien Productions Inc. All rights reserved
all images & video are for use only on www.pariswhilton.org


Some videos require Adobe Flash Player, you can download it here
Some videos require Quicktime, you can download it here

Sunday, June 14, 2009

art bell help with imigration thank you

Home > Shows > Anti-Gravity & Other Hi-Tech

Anti-Gravity & Other Hi-Tech
Show Audio
Real (High Bandwidth)
Win (High Bandwidth)

Real (Low Bandwidth)
Win (Low Bandwidth)


Highlights:
UFO Sighting & Evidence
win real

Anti-Gravity Research
win real

Physics of Art's Antenna
win real

MP3 Downloads:
Hour 1 Hour 2 Hour 3 Hour 4
Date:
06-06-09

Host:
Art Bell

Guests:
Bob Koontz



Filling in for Ian Punnett, Art Bell welcomed experimental nuclear physicist Dr. Bob Koontz, who talked about his UFO sighting in Central Pennsylvania and how it led him into a new field of research. The object, which Koontz was able to photograph with a digital camera, appeared to be disc-shaped with a dome. He estimated the UFO was traveling only 10 to 15 miles per hour and in distress, as it had what looked like smoke trailing behind it.

Koontz thinks anti-gravity technology may have been keeping this slow-moving craft suspended in the air. To prove his theory, Koontz set up an experiment based on the Biefeld-Brown Effect. According to Koontz, his test produced a demonstrable change in effective mass and convinced him that anti-gravitic systems are possible. In addition, Koontz referenced the work of self-taught Canadian scientist John Hutchison, who allegedly caused a 70-pound cannon ball to levitate with cancelling electromagnetic fields.

Koontz discussed the work of Stan Meyer, who prior to his death purportedly developed a car that could run on water. He believes Myer found a specific 'scalar resonance' that could be used to instantly breakdown water into hydrogen and oxygen. Koontz also touched on Steven Mark's toroidal power unit, free energy, scalar electromagnetic weapons (supposedly used by the Russians to modify weather), HAARP, and the physics of Art's massive ham radio antenna.


Website(s):
doctorkoontz.com

Related Articles
Art Bell's Wife Denied U.S. Visa

Airyn Bell, wife of radio talk show legend Art Bell, has been denied a U.S. Visa. Read about their incredible struggle against the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). [Click the image on the left for proof the USCIS received the necessary documents from the Bells.]

Please also help Art plead his wife's case. Contact the President and his staff at whitehouse.gov.

Here's the letter Art Bell wrote to Senator Harry Reid on behalf of his wife Airyn Bell:

My name is Arthur W. Bell. My Wife is Airyn R. Bell. We have been Married over (3) Years now and have a (2) Year old Daughter who was born in Las Vegas, Nevada. My Wife is Philippine. In December 2006 she was given a CR1 Visa which was processed by the American Embassy in Manila, Philippines. We arrived in Las Vegas Dec 26, 2006.

In Oct 2008 (Oct 10th, 2008) we sent USCIS a I-751 with evidence of our Marriage and the fee ($545.00). My Wife went to Las Vegas and did the Bio-Metric. We were given case Number WAC0900851515. In early January 2009 we received a notice from the California service center to send MORE evidence. Within a few days we responded with much more evidence, it was RECEIVED by USCIS on Jan 15th 2009 (See POSTAL RECEIPTS - click for enlargement). Then in early March we received a notice that USCIS had not received our additional evidence and moreover that there was NO appeal and it was case CLOSED! So of course I called USCIS and they told me to send the evidence that they in fact received our package in a timely fashion which I did. They returned a letter saying they were sorry and had sent us the wrong form response and that we should send them $575.00.00. That was all they requested, so that's all we sent. At this point we had already sent $545.00 (which was cashed) with the original application and I thought even though this sounded wrong, what the heck, rather than argue with USCIS I just sent the money. They returned the check saying it was incomplete, but that was all they had asked for, most of the responses from USCIS seemed to refer to other cases, not ours, but I was tired of fighting.

In both sets of evidence we included:

- Our Marriage License
- Our Daughter's Birth Certif.
- Our JOINT bank accounts (2)
- Health insurance
- Joint car registration
- My Last Will (With my Wife and Daughter as receiving sole benefits)
- Social Security paperwork for all of us.
- Pictures (Trips we have taken etc.)
- The (2) homes I own in Nevada, payed in full
- (2) signed (Notarized) statements from friends attesting that our marriage is indeed in good faith
- Many additional documents proving it is a real Marriage entered to in good faith and still healthy

Then we had to return to the Philippines because of Family concerns and property there. Prior to leaving we went to USCIS in Las Vegas and had my Wife's Passport stamped because her Conditional green Card had expired at the end of December 2008. They stamped it for another Year, they told us it was OK to travel, just be sure to get her Passport stamped.

So, we are now in the Philippines with this horrible mess behind us. We will be here until we get the Family issues resolved and decide what to do with the property we own (A Condo) here in Manila.

We left the U.S. on March 10, 2009.

I think of myself as a good American, however I do not feel as though I have been treated as one. Can you possibly help out in trying to untangle some of this mess? I have no idea what my Wife's status is currently and no idea what steps to take next. I have called the USCIS, I have faxed them, I have sent return receipt required letters, all with no response, or with a response that does not relate to our case.

We have now been told my Wife can not return to the U.S. Please see response from USCIS. This was the FINAL step before they were to issue her 10 Year GREEN CARD, now they want us to start a two Year process ALL OVER AGAIN BECAUSE OF THEIR MISTAKE. THIS IS JUST WRONG. Please help us, it may take direct legislative action because the following was received following a letter sent by a congressional aide:

=======================================

Thank you for contacting the Congressional Liaison Team within the California Service Center. Since the applicant is out of the country after the case was denied. The petitioner will need to start from filing the I-130 petition again for the beneficiary.

The reason for the denial was explained in the denial notice that your constituent received. The evidence was not received.

The applicant's status has been terminated at this point, and she will not be able to return to the United States using the stamps in her passport.

Sincerely,

Yining Wu
Adjudication Officer
Congressional Unit
DHS/USCIS/CSC

=======================================

As you can see, they say they did not receive the evidence, but in fact THEY DID. Does the truth even matter?

Yours Truly,

Arthur W. Bell & Airyn R. Bell

Art's Webcam 6/6/09

Asia Bell celebrating her 2nd birthday



Bumper Music
Bumper music from Saturday June 06, 2009

1. Midnight Express (The Chase)
Giorgio Moroder 2. Don't Leave Me This Way
Thelma Houston 3. Self Control
Laura Branigan
4. In the Air Tonight
Phil Collins 5. I Can See for Miles
The Who 6. Wicked Game
Chris Isaak
7. Waterloo
ABBA 8. Year of the Cat
Al Stewart 9. Isn't It Time
The Babys
10. Barracuda
Heart 11. The Logical Song
Supertramp 12. Mummer's Dance
Loreena McKennitt
13. Twilight Zone
Golden Earring 14. Tonight, Tonight, Tonight
Genesis 15. Words of Love
Mamas & Papas
16. Midnight in the Desert
Crystal Gayle


Site Map RSS FAQs Customer Service Podcast Help
© 2009 Premiere Radio Networks Inc. Copyright & Trademark Notice Privacy Policy Terms of Use

Monday, June 08, 2009

ART BELL AND ROBERT KOONZT ON THE HUTCHISON EFFECT

Date:ART MAKES A COMEBACK ON WWW.COASTTOCOASTAM.COM WITH ROBERT KOONZT TALKS INCLUDES THEE HUTCHISON EFFECT
06-06-09

Host:
Art Bell

Guests:
Bob Koontz



Filling in for Ian Punnett, Art Bell welcomed experimental nuclear physicist Dr. Bob Koontz, who talked about his UFO sighting in Central Pennsylvania and how it led him into a new field of research. The object, which Koontz was able to photograph with a digital camera, appeared to be disc-shaped with a dome. He estimated the UFO was traveling only 10 to 15 miles per hour and in distress, as it had what looked like smoke trailing behind it.

Koontz thinks anti-gravity technology may have been keeping this slow-moving craft suspended in the air. To prove his theory, Koontz set up an experiment based on the Biefeld-Brown Effect. According to Koontz, his test produced a demonstrable change in effective mass and convinced him that anti-gravitic systems are possible. In addition, Koontz referenced the work of self-taught Canadian scientist John Hutchison, who allegedly caused a 70-pound cannon ball to levitate with cancelling electromagnetic fields.

Koontz discussed the work of Stan Meyer, who prior to his death purportedly developed a car that could run on water. He believes Myer found a specific 'scalar resonance' that could be used to instantly breakdown water into hydrogen and oxygen. Koontz also touched on Steven Mark's toroidal power unit, free energy, scalar electromagnetic weapons (supposedly used by the Russians to modify weather), HAARP, and the physics of Art's massive ham radio antenna.


Website(s):
doctorkoontz.com

Labels:

Friday, May 15, 2009

I ASKED NICKY AND PARIS HILTON FOR ADVICE ON THIS I FEEL STUPID

Hello John,




Thanks for showing interest to be a part of the Shoot Session.



This session is being put together by BEN SHERMAN DESIGNS who are launching some of their new designs into the Market and like you already know it is for 7 days.



For this Job,BEN SHERMAN DESIGNS which is the Client wants just foreign Talents for the shoot and we are the appointed Agency who has been saddled with the responsibility of providing a few International Models which is why you were contacted and there will not be any show of NUDITY.



The contract sum for this Job is 40,000 Pounds, a daily allowance of 150 Pounds and a 1,500 Pounds for all your travel arrangements since you will be required to book your round trip ticket yourself at any airline of your choice.

The Client BEN SHERMAN DESIGNS is a household name which is well known in different variety of designs ranging from Jackets, coats, T-shits, polo shirts, Denims, Sweat shirts, Trousers and Shorts, foot wears and Under Wears all Men attires. As for Women they also have brand of Varieties ranging from Casual Tops, Dresses and Skirts, Trousers and Shorts e.t.c.



All you are required to provide for this Job are a VALID PASSPORT, A UK WORK PERMIT and A UK MODEL LICENSE (from the British Home Office here in the UK), that is if you have never had a paid Job in the UK.But if you have a valid EU Passport, then you will not be needing the Work Permit which means you will need just Model License.



For this Job you will be required to work with the Home based Photographers that will be contracted in very choice and picturesque Locations such as beaches, hilltops and fashionable parks and environs.



You are to know that all your traveling expenses and accommodation will also be covered by BEN SHERMAN DESIGNS and you will also receive an upfront payment of 50% as soon as you acquire the needed documents that will stand as proof that you will really honor the contract.



Kindly note this Job is billed to kick off 3rd June 2009 so we require your utmost dedication and allegiance but if the timing does not suit you, just let me know.



Let me know if you require any other info.



Regards,

Raymond Anderson.

+44704576XXXXXXXXXXX

Labels:

Thursday, May 07, 2009

STALKERS AUDIO STRIPPED THIS VIDEO THIS IS ORIGINAL

STALKERS GOT A HOLD OF THIS AND STRIPPED THE AUDIO YEARS AGO CAUSING TRUOBLE AND LOSS THE MAIN STALKER DEID AERRIELLE LOUISE SERBAN 2007 OTHER STALKERS AND CYBERPSYCHOTICS OUT THERE STILL LIKE ACE BAKER WHO SHOT HIMSELF ON RADIO AFTER HE DID NOT SHOW UP HERE TO MEET HIS 100.000 CHALLENGE I SIGNED HIS PAPERS THAT ARE ON THIS BLOGGER CNN SHOWED UP WITH DR WILSON WE HAD OUR DEMONSTRATION NOV 1 2008 SUCCESFULL AIRED I DONT KNOW ANYWAY AT LARGE IS WEB SITES THAT ARE USEING MY NAME IN IDENTITY THEFT MY OFFICIAL SITES ARE HTTP://JOHNKHUTCHISON.BLOGSPOT.COM BLOGGER HTTP://WWW.MYSPACE.COM/JOHNKHUTCHISON AND http://www.youtube.com/user/johnkhutchison2008 ANYTHING ELSE REPRESENTING ME AS A WEBSITE IS BOGUS AND TAKEING DONATIONS TO SUPPORT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IF YOU WANT TO DONATE ASK JOHNKH25@YAHOO.COM THANKS PLEASE ANY RADIO OR TV GRUOPS REPORT ANY STRANGE HATE EMAILS ASI HAVE A FBI RCMP FILE TO DUMP THEM IN

Thursday, April 30, 2009

USA PENTAGON JOB OFFERS

John --




Do not forward or I will seriously kick your ass...I've been drinking beer, so I'm being more honest than usual. Jesus, breaking my own rules...



NGEO is National Geographic.



"XXXXX" is OSD - and the "aerospace exec" I told you about is actually is Paul's boss -- an undersecretary of defense. Not sure which one...



They've been pushing BPP (and your work) into the Pentagon for about 2+ years now - the Pentagon presentation I told you about was their biggest push. Remember - standing ovation? That was CIA, DIA, NRO, USAF, and a few others....about 400 officers in a joint briefing, at least that's what I was told.



They've been fighting on behalf of your research like crazy for the last couple of years, mostly because of the footage that we put together. They want to fund you. GXXXX doesn't (he would, but doesn't have the budget). If they fund you, it will be pure science, not weaponized..



PXXX is a believer, but his boss is still skeptical - that's why I need to get solid footage with HZXXX. If I can get that, you'll have somebody really valuable at your place in the very near future.



THAT is the reason that I've been bugging you so much lately -- you're amazingly close. Closer than John Alexander, who was a Lt. Colonel. Right now we're at the undersecretary of Defense, and I know that Rumsfeld has looked at your work also. If we can put together a couple of hours of solid footage, then we're set. Then you'll have a lab, and I'll quit pestering you.



BTW - If it matters, the "funders" that I told you about are Army Intelligence out of Ft. Meade (NSA). They showed up about 6 months ago. Mostly their interest is having me cover aXXXXXXX conferences, but my handler is friends with PXX, so part of our deal was letting me cover XXXresearch without being censored. (I didn't ask about UFO's, and I have no clue about anything else).

XXXX













--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: john hutchison [mailto:heffect@infinet.net]

Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:40 AM

To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Subject: RE: XXXX and I coming over..?





Hi tim what is ngeo ?? what does lisa want ?? she can have it as it leads to good things in the long term I got it here









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 2:31 PM

To: 'john hutchXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Subject: RE: XXXXXXand I coming over..?







HI John --







Are you going to be home tomorrow? We'd like to give it at least a shot then.







I know that you're frustrated - I'm not in any better position than you are. I'm doingXXXXXXXX on the weekends just to help pay the bills, which are escalating out of control. Nobody in my audience gives a shit: I sent out some funding requests last month and got back nothing. It's generalized apathy on a massive-scale -- at least in your case you can pull up stakes and find someplace to go.







Lisa's not going to be able to help - Coast and NGEO want the footage for their audience, and that's it. In my case, I don't want your existing footage, but I'd like to shoot some of my own for the Air Force guys. If I can take them footage of the effect plus my first-hand word that it happened when I was there, then I think they'll fund you like they promised to. Also,XXXXXXfrom the STAIF Conference also wants to visit in the next couple of weeks, and he knows a bunch of aerospace-industry execs that can help...he was talking about bringing one of them with him.







I've been trying to get you funding for a long time - since we visited last year. I keep getting told that everybody loves your work, but they're nervous about putting money into it without solid confirmation that it's a real effect. That's why I need to be there (otherwise I could just stay home & take XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX If we can get you funding, I still won't get anything out of it, but at least it will be a way to help a friend pay his bills, and it may even lead you into funding for a research lab.





XXXXXXXXXXXXXX can pay for XXXXX, Arizona where they're going to put this thing together. It's going to take setting up the XXXX first to make it financially practical, but that's the best they can do. I'm telling you buddy, nobody has cash at the moment, which is why the Air Force & aerospace industry is such a compelling opportunity - at present, they're the only game in town.







Anyhow, let us drop by tomorrow afternoon -- if nothing else, we can get your worries on tape, and maybe that'll help the situation. If you want to fire up the equipment, maybe we can capture some footage, and I can use that to strong-arm the USAF guys, and XXXwill use it to sell his aerospace-exec on a trip up to your place.







XXXX













--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: john hutchison [mailto:heffect@infinet.net]

Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 1:47 PM

To: 'XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Cc: XXXXX

Subject: REXXXXXX and I coming over..?



Hi guys lisa is on standby this stuff is for the originators as well as XXX tv I think I indicated that in my email unless you guys want to ship XXXXX is getting results with his XXX hes my student of many who is willing to learn this stuff iam calling it a wrap and getting out of here plus theres already a number of complaints DO I CARE NO cheers john









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



From: HXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 10:01 AM

To: john hutchison

Subject: XXXand I coming over..?







Hi John... I just got off the phone with XX who called me as he and I would be very interested in coming over with both our video cameras to capture as much as possible while your up and running. If tomorrow is convenient, XXXXXX could be up fromXXXXX by 11 or noon and we could position the two cameras for best results should something happen. And as a side benefit, I also think it just might be a good opportunity to get you back on Coast as XXXXX and I could put together a good synopsis of what you're doing and then we could suggest to Coast that they have you back on (if your interested in that)?







XXXXX will also be in touch with you and I'll try calling you a little later when I'm in New West as my son and I will be working out at the Canada Games pool todayXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX





Report to moderator 209.17.145.97



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



JOHN KENNETH HUTCHISON LOVE BEACHS I WILL NOT GROW UP; ONLY IN EMERGENTCYS!OFF SOUTH MAY THE WIND BE AT OUR BACKS !ON THE EDGE OF FOREVER AND A DAY; I WILL SEE YOU SOON ; HIDDEN MESSAGES PERHAPS;YET WE ARE ALL SPECIAL AND DONT FORGET IT SEE YOU ON THE BEACH AT DUSK SOMEWHERE





Pages: [1]





« previous next »



Jump to

STALKERS

Forum title: Ok ATS, is John Hutchison a proven fraud?


I originally was going to post a fairly brief reply to this post:

[i]reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread448616/pg1#pid6048630]post by TravisT[/url][/i]

[more]

Not too long after beginning research on this topic I realized that this was becoming too large and perhaps was better off as a new topic.

Later I found another post proclaiming John to be a proven fraud while digging through posts mentioning John Hutchison on ATS-

[i]reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread426529/pg8#pid5671480]post by Intothepitwego[/url][/i]

[more]





For the most part I agree about Billy Meier, even if he had something legit early on he destroyed any "street cred" he had by perpetrating multiple fakes. His ex-wife making the statement that he produced fakes/hoaxes doesn't help his case. The "wedding cake ufo”; faked photos and misleading photos taken of television shows, dinosaur books and other things; and the "ray gun"; don't inspire much faith from me in Billy Meier. This is my strong opinion that, at least his later stuff was very suspicious and enough things were clearly exposed to be fraudulent that there is little question left in my mind concerning Mr. Meier's credulity His early UFO pictures, to the best of my knowledge, still pass analysis by photo experts and no one has been able to produce/duplicate what is shown in his early photos with technology available at the time. It has been a couple years since I've given Billy any thought or research so my information could be dated and or completely incorrect concerning him.

I realize that there are still some die-hard supporters of Mr. Meier around, you are welcome to contact, debate or flame me via U2U but please don't confuse the topic of this post with anything concerning Billy Meier or other unrelated topics.



Ok back to the topic at hand:

If any group of individuals can shed some light on this subject, perhaps even answer this question, I believe it is the members here at ATS that can deny ignorance and get the job done. That question is:

[b]Has John Hutchison been [u]proven [/u] to be a fraud? [/b]

to be more specific

[b] Have all, or even a substantial portion, of his varied demonstrations and results been disproven and/or exposed as hoaxes beyond any reasonable doubt? Is there any evidence condemning John other than the debate over the “ufo on a string video” (he clearly points out the wire/string in the original video before and during the demonstration, he wasn't trying to hide it, by definition this is not an attempt to deceive or defraud [3],) Can anyone reference anything new? Something better than the few attempts to duplicate a small portion of the reported effects with optical trickery that still don't completely duplicate what is seen in the videos? Has anyone detected a string, a string attachment point, editing techniques, other obvious or even subtle indications, perhaps even proof of a hoax while analyzing his videos? [/b]

Now in reply to the posters above...

Am I to take what was said as a truth statement that John Hutchinson is a proven fraud or is it merely your opinion that I mistakenly took as a truth statement? Is the lumping of Billy Meier and John Hutchison an attempt at associative fallacy? If it was a truth statement, then please enlighten me. Share with me your evidence that proves he is fraud. If it was just your opinion then by all means you are entitled to it, but please in the future don't attempt to pass along thoughts, ideas, theories and opinion as proven fact. Perhaps someone has or you have effectively debunked or disproven all of his results or proven several clear and intentional hoaxes that I am not aware of. If this is the case then you have my apologies.



Introduction:

I am asserting that claims of a hoaxing or fraud are extremely strong and clear claims, that need to be supported by very strong evidence.

Any substantial evidence or information supporting any point of view in this debate will be considered and appreciated by myself and hopefully everyone else. Please attempt to keep basic opinions, emotion, and especially hatred, flames, prejudice, insults and especially ignorance to a minimum. If someone simply does not believe John , doesn't want to believe in the possibilities if his effect is legitimate, simply hates John and other “hippies” or similar thoughts and opinions and you have no facts to add then please, just be cool, sit back and see what happens here; or move on. If it is really “nagging” you to include your thoughts then do so, but I am asking the moderators to please keep a close watch on this topic.

I suggest three main hypotheses in this case: (we aren't attempting to prove any of these in this thread expect for 3, but supporting evidence for the others is welcome.)

1. Everything John Hutchinson produces is a genuine, if not always predicable and as yet may be unproven, not generally accepted , completely understood or easily repeatable.

2. Some of John Hutchinson's results have been genuinely produced. Other results have been exaggerated, incorrectly represented and/or poorly understood or .

3. Everything John Hutchison has presented as experiments and results are fraudulent and have been perpetrated as an intentional hoax. He decided to attempt to fool the world long ago and has done a rather impressive job of it.



Still, again, remember the primary goal of this forum topic is to logically and honestly answer the questions “Is John Hutchinson currently a proven fraud?”



To my knowledge, considering my somewhat limited yet expanding research concerning John Hutchison:

Summary:

There is a good deal of controversy and debate. So far I have read a substantial amount of poorly researched, negative and /or ignorant debunkers, disbelievers, and pseudo-skeptics proposing how he [b]might [/b] have faked his videos, some ad hominem and otherwise deceptive arguing, but nobody has fully reproduced or adequately explained to me how he faked his results or perpetrated a hoax, hoaxes or fraud. I have also reviewed quite a bit of material and testimony in support of Mr. John Hutchison, although I would like to see some more evidence of individuals and scientists speaking on his behalf, witnessing his experiments, doing peer reviews and duplicating results from his experiments..



Examination and observation:



The super-strong electromagnet/upside down camera[4] does not explain what a lot of non-metallic objects do in the videos. Nor have they explained what many metallic samples have exhibited. Metals appear to liquefy, twist, break apart and/or bend in some videos. Analysis of some of his metal samples indicate aging, spontaneous rusting and changes to molecular structure [3][12][17]. The attempted debunking of these results have not effectively and fairly explained the majority of these alleged frauds. Many of the reported effects have not been duplicated on video, even using 'Hollywood' trickery. (Personally, I would like to see a debunker duplicate the metal bar breaking apart and then one half flipping over while the other stays in place and/or duplicate other similar observations, especially the ones with water, other liquids and metals.)

How large of an electromagnet consuming how many watts of energy would it take to suspend a 70lb. canon ball? Someone please do the math on this one, my primary assumptions are leading me to think that John Hutchison wouldn't have been able to afford his power bills back in the '80s if he is producing what is in many of his video with large and powerful electromagnets alone.

Many results that John has reported have not been explained completely [12]. Almost everyone likes complete explanations, solid evidence and repeatable experiments; but this goes for all sides, absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence. For example, if no person was able to provide proof of a hoax it doesn't empirically prove that Mr. Hutchinson is genuine either.

The science community, in general, don't like his methods because he “tinkers” and “tweaks” with stuff, doesn't follow scientific method and sometimes doesn't or isn't able to completely explain how and what he is doing, how he is doing it, the theories behind it and his results. Sometimes John has trouble reproducing results from his own experiments and when they do work they can behave and succeed seemingly at random with anomalous and unexpected behavior and results. Other entities have problems reproducing his results. Some people seem to lash out at him simply because he has long hair, doesn't wear a lab coat or a suit, and/or at his mannerisms and personality don't meet their expectations about what he “should” be, among other interpersonal and social reasons. This doesn't disprove or debunk him, it just shows that there is a social prejudice against him in certain circles and by some individuals.

Results produced can not be dismissed simply because someone doesn't follow the established scientific method to produce them. Results also do not have to be replicated every time on demand to be results; to be "scientific" and generally accepted as "proven", yes, to be results, no. Just because people have trouble replicating his experiments and results it doesn't necessarily make him a fraud either. One does not have to understand results or believe them to be possible in an experiment for those results to be valid. Lack of scientific recognition is not proof of fraud.

Scientists from places like Lockheed Martin, the US Army and NASA, among other organizations, have visited him trying to figure out what he is doing and how he is doing it. The Canadian Government seized all of his equipment in 1989 and classified it, denying the return of this equipment to John thus forcing him to start over. Boyd Bushman, a retired senior scientist from Lockheed Martin acknowledges the theft of his equipment [2]. The Japanese have invested in some of his experiments and to the best of my knowledge they have not accused him of being fraudulent. [2][3] John maintains a vast amount of video data for anyone to examine for themselves [12] and reports that one of the effects named after him recently has been accidentally reproduced during a university experiment [11]. John strikes me as a very agreeable and fair person, I believe he would be willing to attempt to show you the effect in person if approached with the respect any being deserves.

So far I have found no evidence that proves, or even strongly indicates to me, that John Hutchinson is a “proven fraud.” Although I have noticed, as a result of my research so far, what seems to be a concerted effort to discredit John for some reason, I have “plowed” through a tremendous number of individuals offering no evidence of fraud or a hoax at all, but clearly and proudly pronouncing John Hutchinson to be a fraud. Then I have witnesses a lesser number of individuals claiming evidence of fraud but not producing anything close to proof yet, at least no where near to my satisfaction. I shall refer to these entities as “The Cult of Disbelief” from now on.

At least one individual has even used underhanded tactics, deliberate trickery and propaganda against him. An edited video [10] was dubiously posted on YouTube.com that shows John doing the experiment with the”toy ufo” attached to a wire with all sound and explanations removed, this does appear to be intentionally cut from the video; in what looks an attempt to make John appear to be obviously and intentionally perpetrating a hoax then being caught in the act. Then the poster claims that only after John was “caught” that he offered the wire explanation. This source is the only original one stating anything similar to my note on [2] by saying “Later he actually admitted the fakery.”

I believe this is the same individual in [3]) So far this apparently immoral and perhaps malicious individual strongly appears to be the original source, or closely tied to the source, responsible for so many people believing that the “ufo on a string” is an intentional hoax and proven. Could this individual also be the original source for the so far unreferenced statement in the wikipedia [2] claiming John admitted to being “creative” with that experiment?

Then I observed a social effect of many self proclaimed “skeptics” and their “fanboys” having jumped on this bandwagon with their battle cry basically being 'look theres a string! Everything he has ever done is fake! YouTube dude says it is so! Case solved! Nothing to see here, he has been debunked, move along!' This video when considered in its original form may be still be controversial but in no way proves that John Hutchison is a hoaxer or a fraud. The experiment was originally done by a well respected T.T. Brown [3][12].





Editorial:



I find it interesting that with roughly 40 years of John Hutchinson experiments on videos not a single person, skeptic, debunker, scientist, video expert, basement troll or computer expert/analyst has found evidence of a single string or other obvious sign of a hoax in a single frame of his videos. I also find it hard to believe that with so many individuals obviously wanting to discredit John, that if they had found the proof of fraud or even a shred of evidence, that some reference or link to it would appear in some of the material I have already researched.

Some scientists may consider his ideas plausible or possible but stay away from him and don't openly support him in fear of ridicule and the loss of their oh so precious grant money. I propose this as a reason why there isn't a large body of accredited experts clamoring to validate his work.

I went through several pages of ATS links after searching for “John Hutchison”. I have found quite a few topics either containing or concerning John Hutchinson and his self-named effects here on ATS in the science, conspiracy, mysterious and other forums, but and I haven't found one yet that is in Skunk Works or that has been “stamped” with “HOAX.” I am using this as my primary circumstantial indication that Mr. John Hutchinson has not been effectively debunked or proven a HOAX by the community at www.abovetopsecret.com to date.

I'm not claiming or making any truth statements here that John Hutchinson has discovered anything or not. I am not making the assertion that he isn't a fraud. I'm not directly attempting to defend John, but at least so far, I have been forced to do some John defending due to some ignorant John hating.

Why do some individuals put so much effort into being a pseudo-skeptics? Is it so they can sleep better at night “knowing” that there can't possibly be anything unknown out there to afraid of or worry about? Why do so many people seem to be terrified of what might be possible? Do they simply enjoy being ignorant and arguing just for the sake of arguing? Libel, slander and defamation of character is fun and exciting for them?

It appears that some individuals and groups are threatened by him somehow. There seem to be people that don't like to have to include all the extra possibilities his reported results bring to the table in science discussions and debate. Some people simply appear to enjoy hating on him and calling him lots of colorful names. There may also be an entity or entities that have a vested interest in discrediting him.

Those of you who have been supporting these proud and self proclaimed skeptics, the “piggy-back” skeptics and “fanboys” that haven't even bothered to do any investigation or research of their own, those of you who based your judgments, flames, disbelief, defamations and worse on the “ufo on a string hoax” slam campaign, those of you who openly, loudly and vehemently proclaimed your “truth”, really should be ashamed of yourselves. In my lifetime, I have born witness to some very despicable and nasty behavior, and the damage after, from people proclaiming absolute truth in support of a blatant and/or purposeful lie. Perhaps this lie has caused some amount of damage that can not be entirely reversed. Is this cool, is this funny, is this fair? Don't flame me or lash out at me for exposing you, if you are guilty of being described in this paragraph then I suggest you take some time to go rethink your misguided and ignorant actions and your life in general. Perhaps even go back and retract all unproven truth statements so boldly and assuredly posted.

The preceding statement is not directed at anyone who is suspicious, undecided or genuinely skeptical that has merely expressed their thoughts, misgivings, honest debate or opinions. Having an opinion and expressing it as such is perfectly acceptable, professing an opinion as “truth” can and does cause damage to other and is most definitely ignorant. Publicly and intentionally spreading half truths and/or lies about someone else, especially with intent to injure or discredit them, is immoral and illegal for a good reason. Supporting someone in the act of these dirty deeds makes one guilty by association.

Ok enough chastising and back to the topic at hand...

Why am I noticing such a strong effort to discredit Mr. Hutchinson recently? Does it have anything to do with Dr. Judy Wood's research and legal efforts concerning 911?

Personally, I would like to see more of the scientific community, other groups and the general public spend less time, effort and thought on what 'absolutely can not be possible' and bit more time pondering what just might be possible. Examples of the past- at one time many individuals in the science community insisted that it was “impossible” to broadcast radio waves over the Atlantic and later that it was “impossible” to break the sound barrier because the results would somehow violate the “laws” of science that they “knew” at the time.



Links, References and Evidence:

Neutral (at least they claim or attempt to be)-

[1} http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/John_Hutchison - Astronomers are scientists, and scientists are expected to be trustworthy, honest and follow a strict set of rules and laws right? Plagiarism is illegal and morally wrong right? Then why does this page appears to be plagiarized almost entirely, except for references being removed, from this wikipedia.org page -

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hutchison Note: I have been unable to find any legitimate reference to the quote stating “Hutchison later admitted to being "creative" with the footage, citing pressure from the Discovery Channel to create material for the show and an inability to legally reproduce the original effect, according to Tim Ventura of American Antigravity” First off this statement is hearsay and the stated reference does not contain this quote. Also, Google search returned no results with someone directly quoting John or Tim Ventura saying this, only links to [1] or [2] and websites linking to [1] or [2].

[13] http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8059605424836315724&hl=en Google video link



Pro/supporting-

[3] http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ_troll_challenge.html

[11] http://hutchisoneffectreproduced.blogspot.com/ independent report of H-effect being reproduced

[12] (John's site here)

[14] http://www.rexresearch.com/hutchisn/hutchisn.htm

[15] http://www.truthforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=382 sites names of individuals who have validated the work of John Hutchinson. Mentions metal samples from the video taped experiments being handed out for public examination and other support.

[16} http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Hathaway_George_664533045.aspx

[17] http://www.blazelabs.com/f-p-hutch.asp



Con/Skeptical- (with my explanation of lack of evidence where applicable)

[4] http://socialtech.ca/ade/index.php/2005/05/the-discovery-channel-is-bogus-2/ actually there are pros and cons in the forum posts on this page. Every con I noticed while skimming through claimed, stated or referenced the same questionable “proof” of hoaxing already discussed.

[5] http://www.csicop.org/sb/2007-09/nickell.html This page strikes me as more pseudo-debunking-

“Because evidence available only on film or tape can easily be faked, I enlisted the help of Center for Inquiry colleague Thomas Flynn, editor of Free Inquiry and an experienced photographer and videographer. We decided that what we were seeing might easily have been staged. One video sequence showed an empty one-liter plastic soft-drink bottle wobbling, then shooting suddenly upward. Tom laughed at the suspicious fact that the handheld camera did not follow the flying object, an indication that there was perhaps something up there that the camera should not see. We concluded that the movement of the bottle was consistent with it having been controlled by an “invisible” thread—or rather threads: frame-by-frame study showed that two attachment points would be required. We then reproduced the effect on a similar bottle using the necessary two lengths of monofilament line with which we caused the bottle to wobble and then soar. I was the hidden puppeteer to Tom’s camera. (See figure 2.) “

Note: “Figure 2 “is a small black and white still picture that doesn't show enough detail to evaluate anything.

“Of more interest to National Geographic was Hutchison’s production of “electronic fog.” Tom and I were unimpressed with this effect which we readily simulated by jiggling a jumble of metallic wire, backlit by a suitable lightbulb, before the video camera’s lens.

Our videotaped results—along with clips showing us making our experiments and commenting on them—subsequently aired on the National Geographic Channel (Is It Real? 2006). The similarity of our effects to Hutchison’s are readily apparent. We see no need to give the supposed wizard further attention”

I have been unable to find any reference to this reproduction video or even the series “Is It Real?” via searches on YouTube, Google video or Google search engine.

I also find it humorous that these guys claims that John makes up scientific sounding terms, “Despite Hutchison’s use of pseudoscientific terminology—he bandies about made-up terms like “cronons” and “gravitons”—his work seems anything but scientific. “ Like ZOMG he used the word “pseudoscientific” that must mean like these guys are totally smart and John is a complete loon and a fraud right? Well considering that cronons and gravitrons are both recognized and/or accepted as theoretically possible in and defined by generally accepted schools of (example: string theories and M-theory) quantum mechanics, who really winds up looking ignorant here?

I would have been absolutely convinced of a hoax, if our experienced videographer could have found any evidence in John's videos of a string or attachment points or evidence of video editing to cover their proposed fishing line, but I am going to assume that he was unable to do so. I would like to be able to evaluate their video or at least still pictures captured from their video to see if attachment points or strings were detectable in their reproduction. Until then I am simply going to cop-out and use a classic pseudo-debunkers tactic on these pseudo-debunkers. Even if they did completely reproduce what is seen in the related videos, that doesn't necessarily invalidate or prove anything. But again, video, or it didn't happen.

[6] http://www.trailerparkscience.com/Experiments.html I have been unable to get this site to open on this link or the homepage for over a week now. Is it abandoned? John haters have professed that this site also proves JH to be fraudulent. Once again, video, or it didn't happen.

[7] http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Hutchison/hutchison.html this page made me laugh because it's author went to a tremendous amount of effort to prove that there was a wire attached to the toy ufo, and did a very thorough and impressive job of it for the most part (I personally didn't like the conclusion). Maybe he should have done a little research like I did and watched the parts where John clearly pointed this fact out multiple times in the original video [3] He might have saved himself much effort and time. .

[8] http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103565 Still more cries citing the “ufo on a string” and assertions that JH is a fraud, with no supporting evidence. I have evidence of the “Amazing” Randi being selective about who he allows to take his “One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge,” basically if he can't cheat the applicant or reproduce the result of their claim with slight of hand; he attacks them via ad hominem and other fallacy tactics in an attempt excuse his choice to not allow a challenge. I will provide this evidence but please request via U2U and do not pollute this thread with that topic.

[9] http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/01/crackpot-in-canada.html This guy goes into more detail on different effects reported by JH, unfortunately his amount of research and detail is limited to observations including but not limited to “looks like”, “looks to me”, “what appears to be”, while throwing in a heaping dose of ad hominem argument. Once again, no evidence of any fraudulent activity is presented. He also swears a lot during his article about JH. To be fair, I do swear sometimes in friendly and sometimes not so friendly “buddy-type” conversations, but I strongly believe that swearing like this guy does in the written language shows character somewhere around low class and an extreme lack of tact. But watch out everyone, this guy is an “action” skeptic, he also pitches “woo.” At least he didn't mention “ufo on a string”, he accuses John of using lots of string but he did not expressly say “ufo on a string”

[10] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yABGpiYONmo&feature=channel_page The adulterated 'toy ufo” video



Conclusion:

At this point I am still open to possibilities on all sides of this debate. I am honestly attempting to be neutral and fair to both sides here. I am stating that so far as a result of what I have researched; the examples, actions, attitudes and yes even blatant and/or intentional ignorance of the skeptical point of view here have been disappointing at best and have not proven a hoax or fraud. Some individuals may have even gone so far in their attempts to debunk John's results that they have opened themselves up to legal recourse. The pro John Hutchinson side doesn't so far appear to be the clear champion in this debate either, many people require complete scientific method validation, but they do have some evidence and testimony that is valid.

If anyone finds any references that are currently missing or has supplemental, new or relevant information please contribute to this topic. If I have made any mistakes in my research, constructive criticism is welcome. Again if he has been proven John Hutchison a fraud, please enlighten me, but do it with logic, evidence and some facts.

love wine and woman

Your result for The Lover Style Profile Test...




The Surprising Lover




Based on the results of this test, it is highly likely that:




You prefer your romance and love to wild and daring rather than typical or boring, you would rather be pursued than do the pursuing and, when it comes to physical love, your satisfaction comes more from providing a wonderful time to your partner than simply seeking your own.




This places you in the Lover Style of: The Surprising Lover.




The Surprising Lover is a wonderful Lover Style, and, like the name implies, is often filled with hidden delights and talents that might not be apparent from a surface knowledge of the person. The Surprising Lover is rather like a geode--sometimes rough on the exterior, but filled with beauty and wonder. The Surprising Lover is thus a gem to find, though it can sometimes be difficult to do so because they often tend to be humble and unwilling to reveal their inner greatness unless they're in a rewarding relationship.




In terms of physical love, the Surprising Lover really shines, often highly imaginative and utterly devoted to bringing the heights of pleasure to the one that they truly love. Given a rewarding, reciprocative relationship, and the right lover, the Surprising Lover can be a delight in bed.




Best Compatibility can probably be found with: The Carnal Lover (most of all) or the Exotic Lover, or the Suave Lover.




Congratulations!




If you enjoyed this test, I would love the feedback! Also, you might want to check out some of my other tests if you're interested in the following:




Nerds, Geeks & Dorks




Professional Wrestling






Buffy the Vampire Slayer






America/Politics








Thanks Again! -- THE LOVER STYLE PROFILE TEST
atHelloQuizzy

Take The Lover Style Profile Test

Monday, April 27, 2009

swine flu help